Skip to main content
Category

Faces of Neurosurgery

Neurosurgeons Putting Patients First

By Access to Care, Faces of Neurosurgery, Health Reform, MedicareNo Comments

The Medicare physician payment system is on an unsustainable path that has failed to keep up with inflation over the years, threatening patient access to care. The American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) are actively engaged in preventing steep Medicare payment cuts and preserving patient access to care through the Surgical Care Coalition. The coalition is in year three of its campaign to stop these cuts and implement lasting changes to the physician payment and quality improvement systems.

On Jan. 1, 2023, neurosurgeons face a minimum 8.5% Medicare payment cut, including a nearly 4.5% cut for all Medicare Physician Fee Schedule services and a 4% Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act cut, triggered due to new federal spending. After successfully protecting patients’ timely access to quality surgical care in 2020 and 2021 by securing Congressional action to mitigate proposed cuts to Medicare, the coalition is fighting against similar cuts proposed for 2023. The AANS and the CNS are also working with Congress on long-term solutions to fix these broken systems. To that end, we submitted detailed comments in response to a Congressional request for information.

The people who the proposed cuts will most impact are our patients. Every day, neurosurgeons take care of some of the sickest patients who face painful and life-threatening neurologic conditions. Alexander A. Khalessi, MD, FAANS, John K. Ratliff, MD, FAANS and Maya A. Babu, MD, FAANS, share their experiences as neurosurgeons and how the cuts will impact neurosurgical practices and their patients. The videos are available as follows:

Patient Process

Why I Became a Surgeon

Earning a Patient’s Trust

Medicare Cuts are Back

Patients Deserve Timely, Quality Care

Editor’s Note: We hope you will share what you learn from our posts. We invite you to join the conversation on Twitter by following @Neurosurgery and @SurgeonsCare.

Faces of Neurosurgery: An Interview with Volker K. H. Sonntag, MD, FAANS (L)

By Career, Faces of NeurosurgeryNo Comments

In Episode 4 of Neurosurgery Blog’s Faces of Neurosurgery interview series, we spoke with Volker K. H. Sonntag, MD, FAANS (L) about his proudest achievements, his favorite surgery to perform and one surgical instrument he couldn’t live without. Dr. Sonntag is an emeritus professor of neurosurgery at Barrow Neurological Institute in Phoenix, Ariz.

Dr. Sonntag is most proud of the nearly 300 residents and fellows he has trained over the years, and the legacy they carry from him. One of his biggest accomplishments was “putting spine on the map” in neurosurgery, and seeing spinal neurosurgery grow over the course of his career. His autobiography, “Backbone: The Life and Game-Changing Career of a Spinal Neurosurgeon,” is available now.

The full interview is available here and on Neurosurgery Blog’s YouTube channel.

Editor’s Note: We hope that you will share what you learn from our posts. We invite you to join the conversation on Twitter by following @Neurosurgery and using the hashtag #FacesOfNeurosurgery.

Faces of Neurosurgery: An Interview with Kim J. Burchiel, MD, FAANS, FACS

By Career, Faces of NeurosurgeryNo Comments

In Episode 3 of Neurosurgery Blog’s Faces of Neurosurgery interview series, we spoke with Kim J. Burchiel, MD, FAANS, FACS, about his passions, his early mentors and what has driven him throughout his career. Dr. Burchiel is currently John Raaf Professor and Chairman Emeritus of the Department of Neurological Surgery at Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU).

Dr. Burchiel is most proud of his contributions to trigeminal neuralgia and deep brain stimulation, as well as building the department at OHSU. His favorite neurosurgical instrument is the computer, something that has changed the field more than anything else.

To the neurosurgeon in need of a book recommendation, he suggests “Undaunted Courage” by Stephen Ambrose — a book about the Lewis and Clark expedition to the west.

When asked about advice for individuals starting a neurosurgery residency, Dr. Burchiel said, “It’s very much like Lewis and Clark. It is a voyage into the unknown — a lot of difficulties lay ahead, and you need to be able to persevere, be resilient and you have to take it one day at a time.”

The full interview is available here and on Neurosurgery Blog’s YouTube channel.

Editor’s Note: We hope that you will share what you learn from our posts. We invite you to join the conversation on Twitter by following @Neurosurgery and using the hashtag #FacesOfNeurosurgery.

Faces of Neurosurgery: An Interview with R. Michael Scott, MD, FAANS (L)

By Career, Faces of NeurosurgeryNo Comments

In Episode 2 of Neurosurgery Blog’s Faces of Neurosurgery interview series, we spoke with R. Michael Scott, MD, FAANS (L), about his early mentors, proudest achievements, and musical hobbies. Dr. Scott is currently Neurosurgeon-in-Chief-emeritus at Boston Children’s Hospital and Christopher K. Fellows Family Chair in Pediatric Neurosurgery.

Dr. Scott says that one of his proudest achievements is leaving behind an extensive legacy of patients throughout his career, as well as the residents he helped train. He is also proud of helping to better define Moyamoya disease and its surgical treatment.

He offers the following advice for neurosurgery residents, “Becom[e] an expert in something that interests you as you’re getting into residency.”

The full interview is available here and on Neurosurgery Blog’s YouTube channel.

Editor’s Note: We hope that you will share what you learn from our posts. We invite you to join the conversation on Twitter by following @Neurosurgery and using the hashtag #FacesOfNeurosurgery.

Faces of Neurosurgery: Dr. Franklin Lin Keeps His Family Safe During COVID-19 Pandemic

By COVID-19, Cross Post, Faces of NeurosurgeryNo Comments

From time to time on Neurosurgery Blog, you will see us cross-posting or linking to items from other places when we believe they are relevant to our readership. Today’s post originally appeared on FOX 5 Atlanta on May 26, 2021. In the video segment, Franklin Lin, MD, FAANS, a neurosurgeon at Wellstar Kennestone Hospital in Atlanta, Ga., and his wife decided it would be safest for him to move out of his home and into a hotel at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“A couple weeks turned into three weeks, three weeks turned into four weeks, and the pandemic just kept getting worse,” said Dr. Lin. He would spend time connecting with his family over Zoom and across the fence of their Marietta home. After getting vaccinated, Dr. Lin wanted to make sure that he couldn’t unknowingly transmit the virus to others. In February, as it became clear that likely wouldn’t happen, he came home after spending 11 months in a hotel.

The full interview is available below and at FOX 5 Atlanta here.

Editor’s Note: We hope that you will share what you learn from our posts. We invite you to join the conversation on Twitter by following @Neurosurgery and using the hashtag #FacesOfNeurosurgery.

Faces of Neurosurgery: An Interview with Kalmon D. Post, MD, FAANS (L)

By Career, Faces of NeurosurgeryNo Comments

In Episode 1 of Neurosurgery Blog’s new Faces of Neurosurgery interview series, Kalmon D. Post, MD, FAANS (L) was interviewed about his proudest achievements, his advice to graduating residents and his favorite surgical instruments. Dr. Post is currently the Department of Neurosurgery chair emeritus at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital.

“I’ve done about 10,000 operations over [the] years, and I think taking care of people and their families has always been number one to me,” Dr. Post reflected on his proudest accomplishment.

To residents graduating and starting their careers, he says to remember, “First you’re not a neurosurgeon; first you’re a doctor. Think about the fact that you have patients and families in front of you, and your first goal is to comfort them and make them better.”

The full interview is available here and on Neurosurgery Blog’s YouTube channel

Editor’s Note: We hope that you will share what you learn from our posts. We invite you to join the conversation on Twitter by following @Neurosurgery and using the hashtag #FacesOfNeurosurgery.

Stroke Month: Continued Progress in Research and Patient Care

By COVID-19, Faces of Neurosurgery, Guest Post, HealthOne Comment

On average, someone in the U.S. has a stroke every 40 seconds. Acute ischemic stroke remains one of the leading causes of death and disability in the U.S. and around the world. The American Heart Association (AHA) estimates that in 2016 there were 5.5 million deaths attributable to cerebrovascular disease worldwide — 2.7 million of those deaths were from ischemic stroke. May is National Stroke Awareness Month and provides the opportunity to remember patients who are survivors of this dreaded disease and highlight the physicians and researchers at the forefront of progress to improve care and outcomes in stroke.

Over the last five years, there have been significant advancements in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion (LVO). LVO is an especially disabling form of ischemic stroke because a large territory of brain tissue and function is typically affected. Five landmark clinical trials published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2015 and 2016 (MR CLEAN, ESCAPE, EXTEND IA, SWIFT PRIME, and REVASCAT) all demonstrated overwhelming benefit for mechanical thrombectomy for LVO. In summary, the studies suggested that only three patients need to be treated with thrombectomy to improve the functional outcome of one patient (number needed to treat (NNT) of 3). This makes mechanical thrombectomy one of the most effective treatments not only in stroke but in all of medicine. The AHA quickly amended its guidelines to recommend thrombectomy for ischemic stroke patients. However, the recommendation was reserved for a select number of indications, including:

  • occlusions of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and proximal middle cerebral artery (MCA) segments of the cerebrovascular tree;
  • those who had received intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (TPA);
  • those with good baseline functional status; and
  • those being treated within 6 hours of symptom onset.

These were significant steps in the right direction; however, there are still many patients who fall outside these indications which might benefit from mechanical thrombectomy.

Since then, indications for thrombectomy have expanded. In 2019, two additional trials were published in the New England Journal of Medicine (DAWN and DEFUSE3) that demonstrated similar positive outcomes in select patients being treated up to 24 hours from symptom onset. Research to establish the role of thrombectomy in several other groups of patients is ongoing, including studies involving:

  • pediatric patients;
  • the elderly;
  • more distal occlusions in the cerebrovascular tree;
  • posterior circulation occlusions;
  • patients with mild stroke symptoms despite evidence of large vessel occlusion; and
  • other conditions.

There remains much to learn about this powerful treatment, and hopefully, the indications for mechanical thrombectomy will continue to expand.

Another active area of research is the improvement in stroke care delivery. Researchers are developing new systems to administer care for stroke patients as quickly and efficiently as possible. Emergency medical services (EMS) and stroke triage systems are being redesigned, often across hospital systems. In some cases, the stroke care team is coming to the patient rather than the patient to the team. In other cases, patients with a high likelihood of LVO bypass closer primary stroke centers and are brought to comprehensive stroke centers for thrombectomy. Artificial intelligence-based tools help identify and select patients earlier for these advanced therapies. New diagnostic tools are being developed that can be utilized by EMS providers in the field. Robotic mechanical thrombectomy and the potential of tele-mechanical thrombectomy are exciting advances on the horizon.

Finally, stroke, large vessel occlusions and mechanical thrombectomy have become an area of interest amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Evidence is emerging from epicenters of the crisis — like New York City — that patients, whether afflicted with COVID-19 or not, are seeking medical attention later in their stroke course due to fears regarding COVID-19. We expect many studies to be published in the ensuing months evaluating stroke and mechanical thrombectomy in COVID-19 patients. We are excited about what the future holds in cutting edge research to bring the best available care to stroke patients everywhere.

Editor’s note: We hope that you will share what you learn from our posts. We invite you to be part of the conversation on Twitter by following and using the hashtag #COVID19.

Justin R. Mascitelli, MD
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
St. Luke’s Baptist Hospital
San Antonio, Texas

 

 

Clemens M. Schirmer, MD, PhD, FAANS, FAHA
Chair, AANS/CNS Communications and Public Relations Committee
Geisinger
Wilkes Barre, PA

Life as a Medical Student During the COVID-19 Pandemic

By COVID-19, Faces of Neurosurgery, Guest Post, HealthNo Comments

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused sweeping systemic changes to the landscape of medicine and society as a whole in the few short months since the virus arose. The pandemic has impacted all medical specialties, and those still in training have experienced significant disruptions to their education. Medical schools were quick to respond to the spread of the virus to keep medical students safe. The first warnings from the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry (URSMD) administration came in early March — students were informed that those who intended to travel during spring break might be required to quarantine upon their return. At the time, the magnitude of the impending pandemic was unknown, and social distancing measures were still on the horizon.

Initially, physical classes were canceled until late March, by which time any students who had traveled to a COVID-19 hotspot would have completed a 14-day quarantine. The plan was to resume regular classes and clinical experiences following this disruption. However, it became clear within a matter of weeks that this would be impossible. For the safety of students, faculty and patients, it was eventually decided that all physical classes and clinical experiences would be canceled for the foreseeable future. Students at all levels were placed in an uncertain position as it became increasingly clear that in-person learning would not be possible for the remainder of the year. This uncertainty fostered fear and anxiety among students — many of whom were also dealing with the stress regarding their safety and that of friends and family.

For preclinical students like myself, we have been utilizing remote learning for the remainder of the year, which has been a significant disruption to our training. In particular, clinical learning has been impaired due to the difficulty of mastering medical history taking and physical exam techniques over Zoom instead of in-person practice with classmates and standardized patients. Another challenge has been coordinating exam proctoring for students who are in different time zones. Some students who have been planning summer research at other institutions or projects involving clinical or volunteer work have had their plans canceled.

Second-year students have been particularly concerned about the logistics of their upcoming United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 1 exams, given that social distancing measures preclude the use of physical test sites. Third-year students have been unable to complete their clinical rotations and have experienced considerable stress due to the ongoing uncertainty in scheduling away rotations for their fourth year. Fourth-year students have had their graduation and Match Day celebrations converted to online events. Graduation has also been moved up. Depending on their specialty of choice, some newly minted physicians have been called upon to begin their residency training early to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Many student doctors have been frustrated because they are unable to contribute to patient care during this crisis. It has been challenging to find ways to help without potentially compromising patient safety. Despite these challenges, medical students at all levels and from all over the country have stepped up to do what they can to support the medical community during this crisis. During the initial stages of the pandemic, students volunteered their time to provide childcare for physicians called to the front lines and organized efforts to produce personal protective equipment (PPE) for health care workers. Additionally, students have made an effort to publicize clinical trials that need healthy volunteers, and the University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC) has initiated a program to recruit volunteer lab techs to help with COVID-19 research. The administration at URSMD has also sent out a request for medical student volunteers who might be called upon to assist in patient transport, ventilator preparation, and supply transport, as well as serving as respiratory care assistants if needed.

Medical education faces challenges moving forward. At this time, it is unclear when or if in-person education can resume. There have already been substantial efforts to promote methods of distance learning for medical students and residents, including Zoom-based lectures and an increased emphasis on online resources. However, this leaves something to be desired for hands-on clinical education, which does not lend itself well to remote learning. It is not clear when clinical rotations can be safely resumed, or when students will once again be able to schedule away rotations. The uncertainty surrounding away rotations is of particular concern for those students who are preparing to apply to residency in the coming year. It also remains to be seen how this crisis will affect the residency match process in the future. Many students have also had research or volunteering opportunities canceled due to the pandemic, and the future of USMLE board exams remains in doubt for the time being.

As a whole, medical educators and students have risen to the challenge of COVID-19. Medical educators have dedicated extra time and effort to minimize disruptions and to maximize students’ learning experience. Many medical students have helped their communities wherever possible and are responding admirably to the unprecedented disturbance in their education. Reactions like these foster hope that both students and educators will continue to work tirelessly to respond to crises as they arise.

Editor’s note: We hope that you will share what you learn from our posts. We invite you to be part of the conversation on Twitter by following and using the hashtag #COVID19.

Stephen Susa
First-year Medical Student
University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry

COVID-19 and Neurosurgical Training: Impact on the Next Generation of Neurosurgeons (Part II)

By COVID-19, Faces of Neurosurgery, GME, Guest PostNo Comments

What started as a brief segment on the evening news has consumed our daily lives as COVID-19 spreads across the globe. As health care facilities became inundated with critically ill patients, the nation’s intensivists, internists, emergency medicine physicians, nurses and respiratory therapists took to the front lines to fight this invisible enemy. With years of education behind us and at the cusp of the most significant health crisis in recent history, many residents are apprehensive of the future. What would be our role? Would we have adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) and critical care supplies to care for the sick? How can we keep ourselves and families safe?

Life in neurosurgery changed in step with the sweeping changes across the medical community, necessitated by potential supply shortages and increased patient volume. As social distancing took effect, the coveted morning sign-out — the bedrock of day-to-day functioning of a busy neurosurgery service — was transitioned to video conferencing. Next was the cancellation of all elective cases, then semi-urgent cases, and eventually, in some hospitals, emergency cases could only be performed after chair/faculty committee approval. Clinic visits were canceled if deemed non-urgent or conducted as telemedicine visits to provide care while limiting disease spread. To protect residents from unnecessary exposure and maintain a reserve, call schedules were changed to limit the number of residents seeing consults at one time or available for cases. As these changes were implemented, unprecedented collaboration, flexibility and ingenuity was prevalent as everyone did their part to ensure care remained as safe and effective as possible.

All neurosurgery residents have been affected. The junior residents, who spend the majority of their time seeing consults in high exposure environments such as the emergency department, saw a significant decrease in volume. Many patients with non-life-threatening concerns were now staying home or triaged appropriately to outpatient follow up. When patients did require evaluation, proper PPE was a necessity, and focused examinations were performed with as minimal patient contact as possible to ascertain the most clinically actionable portions of the exam. The workup of neurosurgical patients was done with an extreme focus on critical data and imaging, necessitating a thoughtful and evolving approach in a resource-constrained environment. For off-call, junior residents, residency experience changed even more dramatically, with potential operating room time virtually eliminated in most programs and off service rotations as neuropathology or neuroradiology postponed. Junior residents turned towards productivity in different areas, such as pursuing research opportunities and reviewing neurosurgical literature. For many residents affected by the cancellation of the written portion of the American Board of Neurological Surgery board exam, the additional study time was a welcome opportunity for further preparation.

Senior residents, who traditionally spend the majority of their time operating or developing the next steps of their career, saw their world go on pause. Interviews for fellowships and jobs were delayed or canceled altogether. Apprehension about how these changes will affect the significant drop in case volumes has compounded their future. At our institution, there was a 95-100% reduction in weekly cases as compared to January of 2020. As a department, we implemented a weekly review of cases that were considered urgent, to identify the few that should be done. Difficult discussions involved patients without emergent indications for surgical intervention — including those with myelopathy, radiculopathy or brain tumors. Alternative treatments and management considerations were instituted as temporizing measures while maintaining close communication with these patients. This case review considered not only the patient’s course without surgery, but also the likelihood of the patient utilizing an ICU bed post-operatively, or the risk to their health if they were to contract COVID-19 during hospitalization.

Operative times increased as the operative team was required to vacate the operating room for a designated period during intubation and extubation to lower transmission risk. Universal testing protocols have been implemented to save valuable PPE and time. Room cleaning and turn-over times also increased. Operating room availability diminished in some institutions as anesthesia machines were utilized as ventilators, and the rooms turned into makeshift ICUs to cope with the surge of patients. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education began accepting COVID-19 patient management as approved cases to accommodate the drop in operative cases nationwide.

While not always called to the front lines, neurosurgical residents across the country sought ways to utilize their unique skillsets to help their colleagues and patients during this crisis. Using the spirit of innovation and ingenuity, some developed projects to 3D print ventilator parts, testing swabs or respirators. Others devised ways to manufacture face shields and other protective devices. The surgical suturing skillset took a twist as neurosurgical services turned to produce homemade masks from cloth and HEPA air filters. Others used COVID-19 webinars to increase their critical care skillset in preparation for possible time on the frontlines.

Neurosurgical education has also been altered. Traditional teaching methods have been abandoned for digitization. Much like the broader educational system, neurosurgery responded with unification over video platforms. Journal clubs offer opportunities to share screens and materials. Morbidity and mortality conferences continued via a secure connection. National organizations such as the Congress of Neurological Surgeons expanded their education platform to include virtual visiting professors and webinars. Information sharing through social media platforms have triggered unprecedented opportunities to communicate and learn with both the national and global neurosurgery community.

The future remains uncertain for now. While there is talk of restrictions being eased in some parts of the globe, the U.S. still has difficult days ahead. We are grateful to the intensivists, internists, emergency medicine physicians, nurses and respiratory therapists who are bearing the brunt of this war. They are the true heroes. The silver lining of this experience is what we have learned about ourselves and what we have achieved with our ingenuity.

As will be the case in other specialties, telemedicine has shown its utility in neurosurgery and is here to stay. Although lacking the personal connection many of us hold sacred, telemedicine has proved to be a suitable alternative for patients in rural settings with long travel distances or those with debilitating conditions that make travel a stressful experience. This creates new opportunities to provide highly specialized neurosurgical care from a central location with patient experience and convenience at the forefront. Virtual video meetings have changed how we share information, collaborate on research and learn. The ability to 3D print ventilator parts and PPE has shown us the promise of technology. With time, the focus will shift away from the needs of the pandemic and to newfound innovations with relevance to neurosurgery. As a profession will come out from this with a renewed focus on the improvement of patient care.

Editor’s note: We hope that you will share what you learn from our posts. We invite you to be part of the conversation on Twitter by following and using the hashtag #COVID19.

Redi Rahmani, MD
PGY-4 Neurosurgery Resident
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, N.Y.

 

 

Nathaniel R. Ellens, MD
PGY-2 Neurosurgery Resident
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, N.Y.

 

 

Tyler M. Schmidt, DO
PGY-7 Neurosurgery Resident
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, N.Y.

COVID-19 and Neurosurgical Training: Impact on the Next Generation of Neurosurgeons (Part I)

By COVID-19, Faces of Neurosurgery, Guest Post, HealthNo Comments

In early March, our neurosurgery team at Mount Sinai Medical Center noticed a handful of COVID-19 cases admitted to our medical intensive care unit (MICU), which is just down the hall from the neurosurgical intensive care unit (ICU). The daily news from Asia and Europe was certainly not encouraging, but we proceeded with our normal routine — morning rounds, surgery and academic conference.

Then, for one-week, cases of COVID-19 filled the MICU. Shortly after that, our neurosurgical step-down — followed by the neurosurgical ICU — were rapidly converted into negative pressure rooms for COVID-19 patients. That same week, our hospital system placed a hold on all elective, non-emergent surgeries. By Friday, March 20, at a time when there were 7,102 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in New York (with 46 deaths), Governor Andrew M. Cuomo ordered all non-essential businesses closed and their employees to stay home. The following day, our department leadership held an emergency town hall video conference discussing a re-organization of the department. As of the writing of this article, our 18-bed neurosurgical ICU is at double capacity and frequently caring for more than 40 critically ill, ventilated COVID-19 patients every day — accounting for new admissions, discharges and mortalities.

As health care providers and citizens of New York City, my colleagues and I have witnessed our home become the U.S. epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic — surpassing all other regions in terms of the number of confirmed cases and deaths. What has transpired over a month here in New York City has completely shifted the way we provide health care — in general, as well as the practice neurosurgery — and how we learn as resident physicians.

There has been a city-wide diversion of health care resources to care for critically ill patients with COVID-19. From the conversion in operating rooms and post-anesthesia care units (PACUs) to ICUs, to the transition of neurocritical care faculty and providers to staff these units, all have led to a shift in focus for residents of neurosurgery. With elective surgeries on hold, our daily routines have changed dramatically. In addition to caring for neurosurgical emergencies, many residents have assumed a greater role in providing critical care — staff both the neurosurgical and respiratory ICUs. This has meant — particularly for more senior residents and neurosurgical attendings — a deep dive into critical care medicine, ventilator management and the latest therapeutic strategies for COVID-19. One piece of expertise that neurosurgery residents can bring to the respiratory ICU is turning patients into the prone position. This maneuver can salvage some patients with significant respiratory compromise. One commonality for all health care providers during this time is the feeling of being outside one’s zone of comfort. Whether this takes the form of a neurosurgical resident staffing the respiratory ICU or a general sense of uncertainty over when this crisis will end, this unified sensation has led to individual and interpersonal growth.

During this time, neurosurgeons have also witnessed the redefinition of a neurosurgical emergency. As providers, we have had to make difficult decisions on both ends of the emergency spectrum — for example, from purely elective spine surgery to active herniating discs. In the current pandemic, physicians worldwide have been needed to decide which COVID-19 patients should not be intubated, given their overall poor prognosis to save the ventilator for a patient with a better chance of a good outcome. We have had to discuss end-of-life care with certain neurosurgical patients who, in other times, would be surgical candidates. Non-emergent but urgent surgeries, including brain tumors, have been pushed back for months — another indirect consequence of COVID-19 that may significantly affect a patient’s overall outcome.

Despite a lack of standard surgical experience, neurosurgical residents have continued to learn during this crisis. Beyond the critical care knowledge, we continue to have didactic sessions, with one significant change — video conferencing. To uphold the sanctity of social distancing, we have been logging in from separate computers in distant locations to participate. We are fortunate to be able to continue our didactic learning. At the same time, our colleagues in internal medicine and other specialties beleaguered by the present pandemic, do not have the capacity for anything besides direct patient care.

Beyond these changes to the health care landscape, we in New York City have experienced an incredible shift in the mentality of daily life. The defining features of the “City That Never Sleeps” — restaurants, subways, cultural landmarks — have been shut down. However, the New York City spirit continues to thrive. We have seen an outpouring of philanthropy, from donations of handmade personal protective equipment (PPE) to deliveries of meals to entire medical units. Like other cities around the world, every night at 7 p.m., one can hear clapping and cheering from apartments and skyscrapers city-wide, an homage to the essential personnel and health care workers keeping New York City on its feet and preparing for a successful emergence in time.

Editor’s note: We hope that you will share what you learn from our posts. We invite you to be part of the conversation on Twitter by following and using the hashtag #COVID19.

Kurt A. Yaeger, MD
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, N.Y.